[Rh] about “crew”

More recently, the crew was released – a remake of the Soviet film of the same name. Did you manage to modernize the first in the Soviet Union of the Catastrofi and correctly transfer the action to our time, you will learn from this podcast.

The best comments

We went with friends today – the film is just great. A long, but the first half does not cause boredom, and the second keeps almost in constant tension, giving a break only a few times for a minute. The script, in my opinion, is quite good (although, from the point of view of people who are versed in the aircraft there are strange places there);Although some events can be predicted when they come, you do not feel boredom or disappointment. The dialogs are also spelled out well, the actors did not disappoint, you believe in the characters, the key features of their characters are traced. In general, very worthy and even compared to Hollywood films. And despite the fact that the film is Russian, so even more than worthy, I join the advice of everyone to go to the cinema.

– Why buy a game if I have already entrusted it to it on Kickstarter?
– Why buy a bottle of cola, if its price covers the production of twenty of the same bottles, that is, I, as it were, paid for its nineteen bottles back?
– Why do the Ministry of Education finance schools if I have already studied?
Why use the brain, if you can simply repeat what I heard from someone on the Internet?

If you are so worried about your money, then let’s count:
The budget of the film – 650 million rubles.
The population of Russia – more 143.5 million man, but for an even account we take 140 million.
Thus, even if the “Cinema Foundation” was alone sponsored the “crew”, he would have to “rob” each resident of Russia in less than 5 rubles. I have everything.

P.S. Not alone you watch Bad Comedian.

Crowdfunding was generally originally conceived as a place where people can contribute to the money precisely the projects that they would like to have been implemented. No buns was originally included in the list, and appeared only because not everyone was capable of gratuitous recoil of money for the idea.

Yes, when they give you https://bettingsitesnogamstop.co.uk/review/spins-heaven/ a game for a donat – it is like a nice and normal. But this never necessarily and the idea of ​​crowdfunding has never contradicted.

And what debt obligations do you need? To return the money? O’key, and if the money is spent, then what? The essence of crowdfunding is that future consumers, as it were, are publishers themselves, and their risks are the same as the publishers, in fact.

Yes, because usually developers give a free copy to the to badgers, but theoretically they may not do this

Well, one could say how Mashkov plays, what Kozlovsky looks like (or what his last name is, I forgot). The film is not only “Well, the plot compared to the original was redrawn”, many generally did not see this very original. And maybe they don’t really want.

Maybe a trick and real, but it was performed by professionals. I doubt that ordinary people in 5 minutes will be able to prepare such a trick using shit and sticks. Yes, and he doesn’t need it there, the plane has a problem: one engine (by the way, they took a real case from 747, when all 4 engines stood up due to the end of the ash), the right stand was stuck, there was a strong Talestrike (who knows what could be damaged there?), a thunderstorm in the point of arrival, one pilot. These points are already enough.

In fact, I have only one serious claim to the new film: a completely idiotic episode with two aircraft. Otherwise, quite suitable cinema. I am quite ready to forgive them with the “glass” cabin of the An-12 and other nonsense about planes. Even the stupid Qus-a, who does not know what CRM is and how exactly the instructor should work. But this fucking episode for 20 minutes I will never forgive them.

That’s why he dedicated most of the video to him. If the film is declared as a remake, then it cannot be evaluated in isolation from the original. In addition, the classic needs to know. We have already rolled up to the point that we consider the films “Avengers”, “Hunger Games”, “Furious” and other shit. As for the acting, it is quite normal, as it seemed to me. But again: it is difficult to judge this, because during the first viewing, especially in the cinema, you pay attention to other things, and therefore did not talk about it.

And really why? That is, the person threw himself through Kickstarter and threw off the desired amount for a free copy. Why buy it twice more? > __

That is, you can donate some 60 Bachinsky by full-grace and not get the game? Well, go down then, not only do they pay the budget ahead, but I can still reinforce with the game.

Of course, no one is obliged to give anything. How to give money – so immediately, but responsibility, debt obligations, then x **.

That’s why in the ass Kralandfowing. If we are talking about Video games.

You seem to replace the large publisher do not have the same buns as the publisher. And in general there were no obligations.

Tell me, and you finished on something that simply did not justify your hopes, or did not follow the promise at all and threw you with money?